Ty Cobb Discusses Comey Indictment and Political Pressures

Former White House Special Counsel Ty Cobb expressed skepticism about the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey during an interview on “Face the Nation” with Margaret Brennan on September 28, 2025. Cobb, who played a crucial role in managing the White House’s response to the Robert Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, suggested that the case against Comey may lack the necessary substance to proceed to trial.

Cobb’s comments followed news that Comey had been indicted on two charges related to his testimony before Congress in September 2020 concerning the investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane. He noted that the grand jury had rejected one of the key charges and approved the others by a slim margin of 14 out of 23 jurors. Cobb pointed out that the standard for a grand jury is merely probable cause, while a trial requires the unanimous agreement of 12 jurors. He stated, “I don’t see any way in the world that Comey will be convicted,” emphasizing that the case might be dismissed before reaching trial.

Cobb characterized the indictment as “wholly unconstitutional” and “authoritarian,” raising questions about the motivations behind the charges. He clarified his previous role in the Trump administration, noting that he was not Trump’s personal lawyer but served as a government employee focused on legal matters. “I don’t have any allegiances or reasons to say anything other than balls and strikes,” Cobb explained.

The discussion shifted to broader patterns of political investigations as Brennan referenced reports from the New York Times indicating that multiple U.S. Attorney’s Offices have been tasked with investigating individuals associated with Democratic donor George Soros. Cobb remarked on the potential implications of these inquiries, linking them to a larger effort by Trump to “rewrite history” and shift blame for events surrounding the 2016 election and the January 6 insurrection.

Cobb stated, “Trump wants to rewrite history so that the next generation may not know that he incited a violent insurrection.” He highlighted concerns over the appointments made by Trump, including personal lawyer Lindsay Halligan, suggesting that these actions aim to manipulate public perception and historical narratives.

Amid this political climate, Cobb addressed the hesitance of some Republican lawmakers to openly criticize the investigations, suggesting that the judicial system must resist political pressures. He commented on the constitutional balance of powers, noting that Congress, as outlined in Article One of the Constitution, should act as a check on the presidency.

“The cowardice of the Republicans” has led to a diminished role for Congress, according to Cobb. He criticized Speaker Mike Johnson for his handling of congressional seats, implying that such actions contribute to a loss of accountability and oversight.

As the interview concluded, Cobb’s insights underscored the contentious nature of the current political landscape, where legal battles intertwine with allegations of political motivation and historical revisionism. The implications of these discussions are likely to resonate as investigations continue and the next election cycle approaches.