Connect with us

Science

Astronomers Discover Unique Supernova 2 Billion Light-Years Away

Editorial

Published

on

Astronomers have identified a new type of supernova, designated SN 2021yfj, located approximately 2 billion light-years from Earth. This discovery, made possible by the collaborative efforts of researchers at the Zwicky Transient Facility in California and the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii, reveals unprecedented insights into the life cycle of massive stars. The findings were published on March 15, 2025, in the journal Nature.

The research team, led by Steve Schulze, an astrophysicist from Northwestern University, determined that the supernova’s progenitor star had shed its outer layers before its explosive demise. Unlike typical supernovae, which distribute a mix of elements, SN 2021yfj demonstrated a distinct layered structure, resembling an onion. “We know of over 10,000 supernovae, but this one is very different,” Schulze noted.

The star that gave rise to SN 2021yfj was estimated to be around 60 times the mass of the Sun. As the star approached its end, it gradually expelled its outer layers, leaving a core rich in heavier elements such as silicon, sulfur, and argon. The team observed the moment the iron core exploded, illuminating the previously ejected material. This observation supports the long-held theory that stars possess a layered composition.

Despite the breakthrough, questions remain regarding the mechanism behind the star’s unique shedding of layers. Schulze’s team suspects that violent internal pulses might have played a role in stripping away material. However, the presence of helium in the remaining layers poses a puzzle. “It’s a fly in the soup that shouldn’t be there,” Schulze explained, emphasizing that helium should have been ejected long before the explosion.

Possible explanations for the helium’s presence include the influence of a companion star that may have disturbed the layers or the existence of powerful jets that could have dredged material from the star, although no such jets were detected.

Historically, supernovae are classified into two primary types: Type I, which lack hydrogen, and Type II, which contain hydrogen. SN 2021yfj represents a new classification, referred to as Type 1en. Schulze remarked, “The properties of this supernova are so unusual that there is no object even remotely similar.”

The team estimates that occurrences of extreme stripping like that observed in SN 2021yfj might be rare, with perhaps one in 1,000 supernovae undergoing similar processes. Most supernovae appear similar unless examined in detail, which makes discoveries like this particularly fortunate. “There was a lot of luck involved in making this discovery,” Schulze added.

Looking ahead, astronomers expect to identify more Type 1en supernovae using advanced telescopes, such as the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory in Chile. Scheduled to begin operations later this year, the observatory aims to conduct a decade-long survey of the universe, potentially uncovering thousands of supernovae daily. “Rubin is going to detect thousands of supernovae every day,” said Anya Nugent, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and a contributor to an accompanying article. The excitement surrounding these discoveries underscores the ongoing quest to understand the universe and the origins of the elements that comprise our very existence.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.