Scott Jennings Challenges Tara Setmayer on Trump’s Peace Negotiations

During a heated exchange on CNN’s *NewsNight*, Republican commentator Scott Jennings confronted political analyst Tara Setmayer regarding former President Donald Trump’s peace negotiation achievements. The discussion escalated as Jennings defended Trump’s diplomatic efforts, which he claimed included resolutions in several international conflicts since Trump’s return to the White House.

Jennings argued that Trump had successfully mediated seven conflicts in the past year, asserting that this record warranted some flexibility in Trump’s dealings with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Setmayer, however, disputed his claims, stating, “He actually hasn’t solved seven conflicts.” The exchange highlighted a broader debate about Trump’s foreign policy approach and his administration’s legacy.

Contentious Debate over Peace Achievements

The discourse intensified when Jennings insisted on the reality of Trump’s diplomatic successes, emphasizing, “They’re literally signing documents and shaking hands.” He urged Setmayer to acknowledge these developments rather than dismiss them outright. The back-and-forth illustrated a significant divide in opinion about Trump’s methods and the outcomes of his foreign policy initiatives.

Jennings maintained that these negotiations have occurred on an almost weekly basis, prompting him to demand recognition of Trump’s achievements. He stated, “Just acknowledge it! We report it on this network!” The tension in the studio was palpable, with both sides firmly entrenched in their positions.

Setmayer’s resistance to Jennings’ assertions underscores the contentious nature of political dialogue surrounding Trump’s presidency. Critics of Trump often emphasize the lack of traditional diplomatic processes involved in his negotiations, suggesting that they were more about personal relationships than structured agreements.

Recent Developments in International Conflicts

In referring to specific agreements brokered during Trump’s term, Jennings pointed to notable negotiations such as the recent peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan, signed in March 2025. This agreement marked a significant step towards resolving longstanding tensions between the two nations, which have a history of conflict.

While Jennings cited six major agreements, including ceasefires involving Cambodia and Thailand, as well as accords between Israel and Iran, Setmayer’s denial reflects a broader skepticism within certain political circles regarding the effectiveness of Trump’s approach to foreign relations.

The exchange on CNN highlights the polarized perceptions of Trump’s foreign policy. Supporters argue that his direct engagement with world leaders resulted in meaningful progress, while detractors contend that these efforts lack depth and sustainability.

The debate surrounding Jennings’ claims and Setmayer’s rebuttal exemplifies the ongoing discourse about Trump’s diplomatic legacy. As discussions about his administration’s policies continue, the impact of these peace negotiations remains a key point of contention among analysts and commentators.

This confrontation serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in evaluating political achievements, particularly in the realm of international diplomacy. As the world watches, the narratives surrounding Trump’s foreign policy will likely evolve, influenced by both ongoing developments and retrospective analyses of his administration’s actions.