Idaho Saloon Owner Faces Backlash After Controversial Promotion

Mark Fitzpatrick, the owner of the Old State Saloon in Idaho, has become the center of a heated controversy after offering free beer to patrons who assist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in identifying and deporting undocumented immigrants. This initiative has led to a wave of threats against Fitzpatrick, including death threats directed at him and his family, alongside significant backlash against his establishment.

Fitzpatrick’s decision is rooted in his dissatisfaction with what he perceives as the negative implications of former President Joe Biden‘s immigration policies. He believes these policies have contributed to a crisis at the southern border. Despite the serious threats and harassment, Fitzpatrick remains unwavering in his stance and is resolute in his commitment to express his conservative viewpoints.

Escalating Threats and Harassment

The promotion has triggered severe reactions, with the Old State Saloon facing intense online harassment. Fitzpatrick reported threats to burn down the historic saloon, which has been in operation for over a century. The situation escalated further when the Idaho Tax Commission informed Fitzpatrick that his business would undergo a full sales and use tax audit, a move he interprets as retaliation for his controversial stance.

The hostility surrounding Fitzpatrick’s actions underscores the divisive nature of the immigration debate in the United States. Supporters of his viewpoint have rallied behind him, expressing gratitude for his bold declaration. One individual, however, faced professional consequences for showing support, reportedly losing their job for wearing Old State Saloon merchandise.

A Reflection of National Tensions

Fitzpatrick’s actions resonate within the broader national conversation about immigration policy and border security. His willingness to challenge the prevailing narrative highlights the risks many individuals take when voicing their beliefs on contentious political issues. He frames the threats against him as a reflection of the “wickedness” of his opposition, viewing the backlash as an opportunity to reinforce his convictions.

In his public statements and social media posts, Fitzpatrick has doubled down on his original offer, demonstrating a commitment to standing firm against the backlash. This incident illustrates the passionate emotions surrounding immigration, revealing the lengths to which individuals will go to advocate for their beliefs. Fitzpatrick’s story serves not only as a personal account of confrontation but also as a microcosm of the broader societal tensions regarding immigration in the United States.