Shark Glam Styler Aims to Outshine Dyson Airwrap with Versatility

The launch of the Shark Glam hair styler has positioned it as a formidable competitor to the Dyson Airwrap, with features that appeal to users seeking versatility in their hair styling routine. Priced at $449 in the United States and £369 in the United Kingdom, the Shark Glam promises to streamline the hair styling process, making it an attractive option for those willing to invest in a high-quality tool.

Shark Glam Specifications and Features

At 1.69 inches in length, 1.61 inches in width, and 9.79 inches in height, the Shark Glam weighs 1.6 lbs. It boasts three airflow settings, three temperature settings, and an 8-foot cord. Each purchase includes essential attachments such as the Glossi Round Brush and the Silki Hot Tool, as well as a choice of two additional attachments from a variety that includes Auto-Wrap Curlers and a Curl-Defining Diffuser. This selection allows users to tailor the device to their specific hair type and styling needs.

Shark has established itself as a challenger in the premium hair styling market, and the Glam reflects its commitment to innovation. Many users, including those with fine, curly hair, have reported significant reductions in styling time. After testing the Glam for a month, one user expressed confidence in the device’s ability to replace multiple styling tools, including their hair dryer and diffuser.

Performance and User Experience

During testing, the Shark Glam exhibited impressive performance. The device’s diffusing capabilities stood out, particularly due to its toggle feature that adjusts the length of the diffuser prongs. This adaptability allows users to customize the distance of the diffuser from their head, catering to varying hair volumes.

Users reported achieving satisfactory results in under 10 minutes when using mid-heat and mid-temperature settings. The absence of a lengthy drying routine is a significant advantage for those with busy schedules. The Glossi attachment, designed for both wet and dry hair, has garnered praise for its ability to create a voluminous, styled finish efficiently.

The Auto-Wrap Curlers, a notable feature of the Glam, received mixed reviews. While they effectively held the hair during styling, some users noted the inconvenience of switching between attachments for different sections of hair. Nevertheless, the overall ease of use and the ability to produce defined curls stood out.

Sound levels during operation were also highlighted, with users noting that the Shark Glam may not be the quietest option on the market, reaching 84 dB when in use. This contrasts with the quieter 74 dB level of the Dyson Airwrap.

Comparative Analysis and Final Thoughts

When comparing the Shark Glam to the Dyson Airwrap, several distinctions emerge. While Dyson offers a more comprehensive range of attachments, Shark allows for greater customization through its selection of included accessories. Additionally, the Shark Glam’s versatility in handling both wet and dry hair provides a significant edge for users seeking an all-in-one solution.

Despite its higher price point, the Shark Glam has proven itself as a capable and efficient styling tool, prompting some to reconsider their loyalty to the Airwrap. Given its performance, many users may find the Glam to be worth the investment, particularly if purchased during promotional sales.

Overall, the Shark Glam has set a high standard in the hair styling industry, demonstrating that it can compete with established products like the Dyson Airwrap. As more users share their experiences, it is likely that the Glam will continue to gain traction among those seeking innovative and effective hair styling solutions.