Top Stories
Federal Court Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Restrictions
A federal judge in Maryland has issued a ruling that blocks the birthright citizenship restrictions imposed by former President Donald Trump. This decision, made on March 28, 2024, marks the fourth nationwide injunction against the executive order, reflecting ongoing legal challenges since its inception.
U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman announced her decision late Thursday, asserting that the restrictions violate the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. The ruling follows a recent directive from the Supreme Court that limited judges’ abilities to issue universal injunctions. Nevertheless, the high court indicated that nationwide injunctions might still be warranted in cases requiring “complete relief” for plaintiffs or in certified class action lawsuits.
In her ruling, Judge Boardman emphasized that her decision does not aim to revive universal injunctions but instead complies with established Supreme Court precedent. She stated, “The only way to afford complete relief to the certified class is to enjoin enforcement of the Executive Order as to each member of the class.” This ruling ensures protection for every child in the United States affected by the restrictions.
The executive order, signed on Trump’s first day in office, sought to limit birthright citizenship for children born on U.S. soil to those with at least one parent holding permanent legal status. Courts that have examined its constitutionality have consistently found it to be in violation of the 14th Amendment.
The case before Boardman was brought forth by two immigration services organizations, CASA and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, alongside eight women who are currently pregnant or have recently given birth. The plaintiffs argued that a limited injunction would be ineffective, as it could result in inconsistent enforcement across different regions.
This latest ruling adds to a series of judicial decisions blocking Trump’s birthright citizenship order. Last month, an appeals court panel, along with federal judges in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, also issued rulings against the executive order, reflecting a significant legal pushback against the administration’s immigration policies.
Judge Boardman’s appointment was made by President Joe Biden, highlighting the continuing legal and political ramifications of immigration policy in the United States. As litigation progresses, the outcomes will likely have lasting implications for birthright citizenship and immigration rights within the country.
-
Lifestyle5 months agoLibraries Challenge Rising E-Book Costs Amid Growing Demand
-
Sports5 months agoTyreek Hill Responds to Tua Tagovailoa’s Comments on Team Dynamics
-
Sports5 months agoLiverpool Secures Agreement to Sign Young Striker Will Wright
-
Lifestyle5 months agoSave Your Split Tomatoes: Expert Tips for Gardeners
-
Lifestyle5 months agoPrincess Beatrice’s Daughter Athena Joins Siblings at London Parade
-
Science4 months agoSan Francisco Hosts Unique Contest to Identify “Performative Males”
-
World5 months agoWinter Storms Lash New South Wales with Snow, Flood Risks
-
Science5 months agoTrump Administration Moves to Repeal Key Climate Regulation
-
Business5 months agoSoFi Technologies Shares Slip 2% Following Insider Stock Sale
-
Science5 months agoNew Tool Reveals Link Between Horse Coat Condition and Parasites
-
Sports5 months agoElon Musk Sculpture Travels From Utah to Yosemite National Park
-
Science5 months agoNew Study Confirms Humans Transported Stonehenge Bluestones
