Top Stories
Federal Court Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Restrictions

A federal judge in Maryland has issued a ruling that blocks the birthright citizenship restrictions imposed by former President Donald Trump. This decision, made on March 28, 2024, marks the fourth nationwide injunction against the executive order, reflecting ongoing legal challenges since its inception.
U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman announced her decision late Thursday, asserting that the restrictions violate the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. The ruling follows a recent directive from the Supreme Court that limited judges’ abilities to issue universal injunctions. Nevertheless, the high court indicated that nationwide injunctions might still be warranted in cases requiring “complete relief” for plaintiffs or in certified class action lawsuits.
In her ruling, Judge Boardman emphasized that her decision does not aim to revive universal injunctions but instead complies with established Supreme Court precedent. She stated, “The only way to afford complete relief to the certified class is to enjoin enforcement of the Executive Order as to each member of the class.” This ruling ensures protection for every child in the United States affected by the restrictions.
The executive order, signed on Trump’s first day in office, sought to limit birthright citizenship for children born on U.S. soil to those with at least one parent holding permanent legal status. Courts that have examined its constitutionality have consistently found it to be in violation of the 14th Amendment.
The case before Boardman was brought forth by two immigration services organizations, CASA and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, alongside eight women who are currently pregnant or have recently given birth. The plaintiffs argued that a limited injunction would be ineffective, as it could result in inconsistent enforcement across different regions.
This latest ruling adds to a series of judicial decisions blocking Trump’s birthright citizenship order. Last month, an appeals court panel, along with federal judges in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, also issued rulings against the executive order, reflecting a significant legal pushback against the administration’s immigration policies.
Judge Boardman’s appointment was made by President Joe Biden, highlighting the continuing legal and political ramifications of immigration policy in the United States. As litigation progresses, the outcomes will likely have lasting implications for birthright citizenship and immigration rights within the country.
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago
Libraries Challenge Rising E-Book Costs Amid Growing Demand
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago
Save Your Split Tomatoes: Expert Tips for Gardeners
-
Sports2 weeks ago
Liverpool Secures Agreement to Sign Young Striker Will Wright
-
Sports1 week ago
Tyreek Hill Responds to Tua Tagovailoa’s Comments on Team Dynamics
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago
Princess Beatrice’s Daughter Athena Joins Siblings at London Parade
-
Science2 weeks ago
Tom Lehrer, Pioneering Satirist and Musician, Dies at 97
-
World1 week ago
Winter Storms Lash New South Wales with Snow, Flood Risks
-
World2 weeks ago
Swingathon Festival Draws Nearly 1,000 Attendees in Allington
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago
Nigeria Claims 10th African Championship Title with Victory Over Morocco
-
Politics2 weeks ago
North Dakota Woman Dies in Lake Crash Following Highway Incident
-
Science2 weeks ago
Trump Administration Moves to Repeal Key Climate Regulation
-
Business2 weeks ago
SoFi Technologies Shares Slip 2% Following Insider Stock Sale